← All writing
// ENGINEERING NOTE BRIEF // DELIVERY · 30-SEC BRIEF · 1-MIN FULL POST

Approval Process Can Cost More Than the Tool It Protects

Compare the cost of the approval process with the cost of the thing being approved, and simplify purchases that cost less to buy than to review.

“If your control process costs more than the asset itself, you aren't saving money, you're subsidizing inefficiency”

  • Companies spend heavily to save $50 on a tool while approval hoops, explanations and waiting waste far more, such as $5,000 in total.
  • Cutting costs by adding a $200 approval process for a $50 tool is waste in Lean terms, not frugality.
  • The hidden costs are lost momentum, context switching for engineers, expensive alignment meetings and delayed output.

Companies will fight hard to save $50 and not notice they are wasting $5,000 doing it

A cheap tool gets treated like a major budget decision. The request turns into approval hoops, explanations, follow-ups, and waiting

Some might call this "Lean" or "being frugal." But it's actually the opposite. True Lean thinking is about optimizing the flow of value and eliminating waste. When a company creates a $200 process to approve a $50 tool, they aren't being Lean -- they are generating Lean waste.

In a pursuit of "cost-cutting" they create massive overhead in waiting and overprocessing. The real cost shows up in: - Lost momentum (the team stops moving while waiting for a SaaS login) - Context switching (engineers filling out finance forms instead of coding) - Manager touchpoints (expensive hours spent in "alignment" meetings) - Delayed output

Most companies think that they overspending. But in reality they are overpaying for buying friction

If your control process costs more than the asset itself, you aren't saving money, you’re subsidizing inefficiency

Have you personally faced such behavior from a company in your career?

COPIED TO CLIPBOARD